A Principled Technologies report: Hands-on testing. Real-world results.

Help users boost productivity with HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PCs

We compared general and AI performance, battery life, and user experiences on an AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U processor-powered HP EliteBook 645 G11 to those of two Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 165U-based Dell and Lenovo laptops

As productivity-boosting artificial intelligence (AI) technologies change the face of business, the Windows 11 Pro PC and processor model you choose for you and your team are more important than ever. Earlier this year, HP launched the 14-inch EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC powered by Zen 3+ AMD® Ryzen premium laptop processors. What benefits can this combo deliver that its competitors can’t?

In our hands-on tests, the 14-inch HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC with an 8-core AMD Ryzen 7035 Series PRO mobile processor received higher general and AI performance benchmark scores, provided longer battery life, and delivered better physical experiences than 12-core Intel® vPro® with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor-based Dell and Lenovo® laptops.

Boost general productivity with an up to 19.3% higher PassMark PerformanceTest 11 score. Supercharge machine learning workloads with an up to 154.6% higher Geekbench AI ONNX DirectML iGPU inference score. Accomplish more unplugged with up to 10 hours and 22 minutes of battery life (based on MobileMark 30 battery life results in Windows 11 Pro best power efficiency power mode).

How we tested

When your goal is to boost enterprise knowledge workers’ productivity with new Windows 11 Pro PCs, you need to consider a number of factors. We tested the performance, battery life, and user comfort on three enterprise-level options with the following configurations:

We focused our testing on battery life and processor capabilities, but we recognize that CPU, GPU, RAM, and storage all play important roles in the overarching performance picture. To create a level playing field, we equipped each PC with 16 GB of memory and 512 GB of PCIe® storage. This is more than enough RAM and SSD storage to power the benchmarking tools we used in testing:

  • 3DMark® Fire Strike
  • Cinebench 2024
  • Geekbench AI
  • LM Studios
  • PassMark PerformanceTest 11
  • Procyon® AI Computer Vision Benchmark

We also looked at the relationship between battery life and performance by running the MobileMark 30 battery life benchmark twice. First, we tested with the PCs in the Windows 11 Pro “Balanced” power mode. Then, we repeated the test with the PCs in “Best power efficiency” power mode. Finally, because high-end processors can generate a lot of heat and the fans used to cool these components can be loud, we recorded the heat and noise output of each PC while using the resource-intensive Cinebench 2024 workload for an extended period.

Finally, to see how long each laptop would run Microsoft Teams while unplugged and in “Best power efficiency” power mode, we simulated a long-running collaboration scenario among nine participants using the popular video-conferencing app.

The results we report reflect the specific configurations we tested. Any difference in the configurations—as well as screen brightness, network traffic, and software additions—can affect these results. For a deeper dive into our testing parameters and procedures, see the science behind the report.

Note: The graphs in this report use different scales to keep a consistent size. Please be mindful of each graph’s data range as you compare.

Boost productivity

Even as we’re adopting new and promising AI technologies to improve productivity, models of where we work are continuing to evolve. Your knowledge workers need PCs that will help them succeed in their endeavors now and in the future—whether they’re working in the office or on the road. Empower day-to-day work with strong system performance and all-day battery life.

General performance

We evaluated the PCs’ general performance using the PassMark PerformanceTest 11 benchmark. PassMark PerformanceTest 11 combines CPU, 2D and 3D graphics, storage, and memory test performance metrics into an overall PassMark rating.1 3DMark Fire Strike scans a system’s hardware and estimates the frame rates you can expect when using CPU- and GPU-intensive applications.2 Cinebench 2024 measures a CPU’s multi-core performance by rendering a 3D scene..3

Chart of PassMark PerformanceTest 11.0 overall ratings. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 5,520.3, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 4,628.2, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 4,961.0. Up to a 19.3% higher overall rating with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
PassMark PerformanceTest 11.0 overall ratings. Higher is better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of 3DMark Fire Strike overall scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 4,708, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 4,945, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 4,794.
3DMark Fire Strike overall scores. Higher is better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of Cinebench 2024 scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 484, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 475, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 486.
Cinebench 2024 CPU multi-core scores. Higher is better. Source: Principled Technologies.

AI performance

Geekbench AI uses large datasets to simulate real-world use cases and evaluate machine learning, deep learning, and AI-centric workload performance.10 In our Geekbench testing, we used the Open Neural Network Exchange (ONNX) AI framework as well as the DirectML AI backend for machine learning on Windows. LM Studio uses local large language models (LLMs) to evaluate AI Chat capabilities.11 In our LM Studios testing, we used the Llama 3 LLM to capture token metrics. Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark uses a variety of inference engines to gauge machine learning application performance.12 In our Procyon testing, we used the Windows ML inference API on the AMD-based system and the Intel OpenVINO inference API on the Intel-based systems. The Windows ML API allowed the use of AMD hardware acceleration features, while the OpenVINO API is optimized for Intel CPU, GPU, and NPU inference.

Chart of Geekbench AI ONNX Direct ML CPU inference scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 2,552, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 2,417, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 2,303. Up to a 10.8% higher overall rating with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
Geekbench AI (ONNX DirectML) CPU inference scores. Higher is better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of Geekbench AI ONNX Direct ML GPU inference scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 4,333, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 1,744, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 1,702. Up to a 154.6% higher overall rating with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
Geekbench AI (ONNX DirectML) iGPU inference scores. Higher is better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of LM Studio time to first token. Lower is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 took 1 second and 99 milliseconds, the Dell Latitude 5450 took 8 seconds and 10 milliseconds, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 took 8 seconds and 52 milliseconds. Up to 76.6% less time to the first token with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
LM Studio Llama 3 time to first token results. Time in seconds. Less time is better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of LM Studio tokens per second. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 shows 5.03, the Dell Latitude 5450 shows 3.00, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 shows 2.66. Up to 89.1% more tokens per second with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
LM Studio Llama 3 tokens per second results. More tokens are better. Source: Principled Technologies
Chart of Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 130, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 126, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 167.
Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark GPU float32 scores. Higher Is Better. Source: Principled Technologies.

Battery life

To see how changing Windows 11 Pro power modes affected performance and battery life, we measured battery life and system responsiveness in both “Balanced” and “Best power efficiency” power plan modes. MobileMark 30 factors in both DC (unplugged) performance and battery life for the MobileMark 30 Index composite score.13 Higher Index scores denote a better balance between performance and battery life. Lower Index scores indicate that the longer battery life came at the price of performance or vice versa. In these comparisons, while the HP and Dell comparison was a toss-up, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC consistently lasted longer and scored higher than the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5.

Chart of MobileMark 30 benchmark results in Balanced power mode. Higher is better. For battery life, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 lasted 9 hours and 28 minutes, the Dell Latitude 5450 lasted 9 hours and 23 minutes, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 lasted 6 hours and 53 minutes. For DC performance, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 1,170, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 1,195, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 1,106. For Index score, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 664, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 672, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 456. All-day battery life with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
MobileMark 30 benchmark results in “Balanced” power mode. Time in hours and minutes (h:mm). Higher scores and times are better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of MobileMark 30 benchmark results in Best power efficiency mode. Higher is better. For battery life, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 lasted 10 hours and 22 minutes, the Dell Latitude 5450 lasted 11 hours and 1 minute, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 lasted 7 hours and 7 minutes. For DC performance, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 878, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 794, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 695. For Index score, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 546, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 524, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 296. All-day battery life with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
MobileMark 30 benchmark results in “Best power efficiency” power mode. Time in hours and minutes (h:mm). Higher scores and times are better. Source: Principled Technologies.

Collaboration

For the collaboration assessment, we set up a Microsoft Teams video-conferencing meeting for nine participants and measured how long the devices’ batteries held out.

Chart of battery life during a Microsoft Teams meeting in hours and minutes. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 lasted 5 hours and 18 minutes, the Dell Latitude 5450 lasted 5 hours and 43 minutes, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 lasted 4 hours and 33 minutes. Over 5 hours of battery life with the HP EliteBook 645 G11.
Battery life while conducting a nine-person Microsoft Teams meeting. Time in hours and minutes (h:mm). More time is better.Source: Principled Technologies

User comfort

Sometimes, opting for high-performing processors can mean users have to deal with more heat or noise coming from the PC. If your team members work with their PCs on their laps or in common areas where excessive noise output can bother others, this can be a real issue. For our hands-on tests, the ambient room temperature was 75.3 degrees Fahrenheit and ambient room noise was 23.5 decibels (dBA). We ran the resource-intensive Cinebench 2024 media-rendering benchmark six times: three times for thermal testing and three times for acoustic testing. Figure 12 shows the median performance scores we captured during the thermal runs. Figures 13 and 14 show the median temps and noise levels.

In this comparison, we found that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U processor-powered HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC received comparable or higher performance scores and was as whisper-quiet as the Intel vPro with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 165U-powered Dell Latitude 5450 and Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 laptops. For reference, 10 dBA is equivalent to normal breathing, 30 dBA is whispering, and 40 dBA is what you’d hear in a quiet office or residential area.14

Chart of Cinebench 2024 scores. Higher is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 scored 477, the Dell Latitude 5450 scored 301, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 scored 484.
Median performance scores while the PCs were plugged in and running the Cinebench 2024 benchmark for 30 minutes. Higher performance scores are better. Source: Principled Technologies.
Chart of average dBA. Lower is better. The HP EliteBook 645 G11 output 24.7, the Dell Latitude 5450 output 27.8, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 output 26.9.
Median acoustic results while the PCs were plugged in and running the Cinebench 2024 benchmark for 30 minutes. Lower decibels are better. Source: Principled Technologies.

The big difference was in thermal output, with the Intel vPro with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 165U-based Dell Latitude 5450 and Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 laptops generating almost 30 degrees more heat off the bottom than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U processor-powered HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC.

Chart of external temperatures. Lower is better. On the keyboard deck, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 was 110.1°F, the Dell Latitude 5450 was 124.7°F, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 was 125.2°F. On the underside of the chassis, the HP EliteBook 645 G11 was 115.3°F, the Dell Latitude 5450 was 145.0°F, and the Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 was 144.1°F.
Median thermal results while the PCs were plugged in and running the Cinebench 2024 benchmark for 30 minutes. Lower temperatures are better. Source: Principled Technologies.

Conclusion

Our hands-on system responsiveness and battery life tests show that investing in 14-inch HP EliteBook 605 Series Notebook PCs powered by next-gen AMD Ryzen 7035 Series processors could help set up your workforce for success. We found that an HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC with an 8-core AMD Ryzen PRO 7735U processor received higher benchmark scores, provided longer battery life, and ran cooler and quieter under load than 12-core Intel vPro with Intel Core Ultra 7 processor 165U-based Dell Latitude 5450 and Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 5 laptops.

  1. PassMark Software, “PerformanceTest,” accessed August 27, 2024, https://www.passmark.com/products/performancetest/index.php.
  2. UL Solutions, “3DMark,” accessed August 22, 2024, https://benchmarks.ul.com/3dmark.
  3. Maxon, “Cinebench,” accessed August 27, 2024, https://www.maxon.net/en/cinebench?srsltid=AfmBOoolmJUgS-UdoGvaP9Y0bJyF2rVSOaGX1CLvrymBOObDtRg3wSNv.
  4. HP, “HP Unveils Industry’s Largest Portfolio of AI PCs,” accessed August 14, 2024, https://www.hp.com/us-en/newsroom/press-releases/2024/hp-unveils-largest-portfolio-ai-pc.html.
  5. HP, HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC – Customizable,” accessed August 14, 2024, https://www.hp.com/us-en/shop/pdp/hp-elitebook-645-g11-notebook-pc-customizable-8z3m6av-mb.
  6. HP, HP EliteBook 645 G11 Notebook PC – Customizable.
  7. AMD, “AMD Extends its Leadership with the Introduction of its Broadest Portfolio of High-Performance PC Products for Mobile and Desktop,” accessed August 22, 2024, https://ir.amd.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1111/amdextends-its-leadership-with-the-introduction-of-its.
  8. AMD, “AMD Ryzen 7 7735U,” accessed August 22, 2024, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen/7000-series/amd-ryzen-7-7735u.html.
  9. AMD, “AMD Ryzen Processors for Laptops,” accessed September 17, 2024, https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/laptop/ryzen-for-business.html.
  10. Geekbench, “Geekbench AI 1.0,” accessed August 22, 2024, https://www.geekbench.com/blog/2024/08/geekbench-ai/.
  11. LM Studio, “Discover, download, and run local LLMs,” accessed September 11, 2024, https://lmstudio.ai.
  12. UL Solutions, “UL Procyon AI Computer Vision Benchmark,” accessed August 22, 2024, https://benchmarks.ul.com/procyon/ai-inference-benchmark-for-windows.
  13. BAPCo, “MobileMark 30,” accessed September 11, 2024, https://bapco.com/mobilemark-30/.
  14. Lexie, “Decibel examples: noise levels of common sounds,” accessed August 27, 2024, https://lexiehearing.com/us/library/decibel-examples-noise-levels-of-common-sounds.

This project was commissioned by HP and AMD.

November 2024

Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.

All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Forgot your password?