Dell ImageDirect vs. Symantec Norton Ghost 11.5 time savings evaluation We evaluated the time savings an IT organization might realize by using Dell’s online ImageDirect image creation process instead of Symantec’s Norton Ghost 11.5. We measured the time savings on four different system configurations: Dell Latitude E5400 notebook, Dell Latitude E6400 notebook, Dell OptiPlex 780 desktop, and Dell Precision T1500 desktop.
Dell ImageDirect vs. Microsoft ImageX time savings evaluation We evaluated the time savings an IT organization might realize by using Dell’s online ImageDirect image creation process instead of Microsoft’s ImageX tool. We measured the time savings on four different system configurations: Dell Latitude E5400 notebook, Dell Latitude E6400 notebook, Dell OptiPlex 780 desktop, and Dell Precision T1500 desktop.
A performance comparison of current and previous-generation Dell Optiplex desktop systems We ran a set of tests to compare Windows performance and system responsiveness on a mix of current- and previous-generation Intel-processor based Dell OptiPlex desktop systems.
A performance comparison of current and previous-generation Dell Precision desktop workstation systems We compared the performance of two current and one previous-generation Intel® processor-based Dell™ Precision™ desktop workstation system.
A performance comparison of current and previous generation Dell OptiPlex desktop systems We tested the system performance, application responsiveness, and system responsiveness of a current and previous generation Dell™ OptiPlex™ desktop systems.
Enterprises seeking to reduce manageability costs are considering multiple computing models currently available. In this Intel-commissioned study, we examined six models that can help achieve this goal:
We pay particular attention to deployment, power, lost productivity, and manageability. We also look at indirect costs such as user experience, security, future proofing/rich application support, desk-side environmental issues, compliance, performance, and mobility.
As part of this study, we created a white paper, a calculator (Excel format), and a presentation (PowerPoint format). An additional document provides supporting data for performance and sizing data.
Total cost of ownership analysis for various computing models (white paper) We summarize our analysis of the six computing models, drawing on our hands-on testing, our TCO calculator, and our research
Total cost of ownership analysis for various computing models – Supporting data for performance and sizing calculations We discuss the methodologies and results of the performance and sizing tests we ran on the various platforms. We used this data as input for the calculator and the other documents.
Various computing models: Total cost of ownership analysis (PowerPoint presentation) We analyze the direct and indirect costs for all six platforms. In addition, we consider the impact of these platforms on the cost of a Microsoft Vista migration as well as the consequences of working across slow local network links and wide-area networks.
TCO calculator (Excel) We used this calculator to examine the costs of the various platforms in our sample enterprise. You can estimate the costs of these platforms in your enterprise by entering specific parameters that reflect your infrastructure.
Responsiveness of Windows Vista and Windows Vista SP1 using Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 on common business file tasks We tested four client-server OS platform combinations to give buyers a sense of the differences in response time they would experience when performing the same file operations on each.
Responsiveness of Windows Vista, Windows Vista SP1, and Windows XP on common home tasks We measured the responsiveness of three operating systems—Windows Vista, Windows Vista SP1, and Windows XP—when performing a set of common home tasks after rebooting, returning from standby, and in ongoing operation. We tested five systems: Dell XPS 600 (desktop), Dell XPS M170 (notebook), HP a1320y (desktop), HP d4100e (desktop), and Toshiba Tecra M4 (tablet).
Responsiveness of Windows Vista, Windows Vista SP1, and Windows XP on common office tasks We measured the responsiveness of three operating systems—Windows Vista, Windows Vista SP1, and Windows XP—when performing a set of common office tasks after rebooting, returning from standby, and in ongoing operation. We tested five systems: Dell XPS 600 (desktop), Dell XPS M170 (notebook), HP a1320y (desktop), HP d4100e (desktop), and Toshiba Tecra M4 (tablet).
Windows Vista business performance: Intel vPro technology-based PCs vs. AMD processor-based PCs We ran scenarios featuring (1) real-time collaboration and communication with MS Office 2007 applications, (2) business intelligence and predictive modeling, and (3) new interface features of Windows Vista.
Intel vPro technology and Windows Vista: A performance boost for common business applications We explored response time during real-world work scenarios on an Intel vPro technology-based PC and three other platforms. We tested scenarios involving data security, finding and using information, and real-time communication and collaboration with Microsoft Office 2007 and other common office applications.
Intel vPro and Windows Vista vs. other platforms in predictive modeling and business intelligence scenarios We explored response time during real-world work scenarios on an Intel vPro technology-based PC and three other platforms. We tested two scenarios using Microsoft Excel 2007 and one using Intuit QuickBooks Pro 2006.
Pairing Intel vPro technology with the new user interface features of Windows Vista in common business tasks We compared the performance in scenarios that utilize advanced user interface features in Microsoft Windows Vista on an Intel vPro technology-based PC with that of three other platforms. We tested three scenarios that took advantage of various new features of Windows Vista. PT made evaluations based on a combination of hard performance measurements and subjective quality assessments.
How an Intel vPro technology-based PC running Windows Vista compared with other platforms on 10 common business scenarios We explored response time during real-world work scenarios involving security anti-malware, sales and marketing with PowerPoint, communication and collaboration, data encryption, Monte Carlo simulation, revenue recalculation, and QuickBooks Pro reports. We also explored the experience a typical business user would have with some of Windows Vista’s user interface features involving find-and-use, playing HD video while executing other tasks, and supporting dual monitors.
Energy consumption of seven Intel chipset motherboards We measured the energy consumption of systems with the following motherboards: Asus P5B-VM SE with Intel® G965 chipset, Asus P5E-VM DO with Intel Q35 chipset, Asus P5K-VM with Intel G33 chipset, Gigabyte GA-G33M-S2L with Intel G33 chipset, Intel DQ35JOE with Intel Q35 chipset, Intel DQ45CB with Intel Q45 chipset, and Intel DQ45EK with Intel Q45 chipset.
Motherboard testing: Ease of integration We tested the following motherboards to determine which would be easiest and fastest for small computer vendors to integrate: Asus P5Q-VM, Gigabyte GA-EG45M-DS2H, Intel DG45ID, and MSI G45M-FIDR.
Desktop system processors: Performance increase from upgrading to current Intel Core i5 Processor-based systems We compared the performance of a desktop using the Intel Core i5 Processor against that of desktops using previous generation Intel processors and against a desktop using the current, triple-core AMD Phenom II X3 B75 processor.
Desktop and notebook system processors: Time and energy savings from upgrading to current models We tested the performance and energy usage of current Intel Core 2 Duo processor-based desktop and notebook systems against that of an older Intel Pentium 4 processor-based desktop system and an older Intel Core Duo processor-based notebook system while running three custom application scenarios.
Consumer notebook and desktop systems: Time savings from upgrading to current models We measured the increase in speed that the latest generation of processors brought to four typical consumer tasks: importing and burning video to DVD; importing, resizing, and burning photo images to CD; copying a DVD to iPod touch; and watching streaming high-definition video.
Performance comparison of two desktop PCs with Intel and AMD processors. We tested systems using an AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core 9500 2.20GHz and an Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.40GHz. We conducted industry-standard benchmarks, custom consumer application tests, and game benchmarks.
Performance comparison: Four Dell XPS 700 systems with various Intel processors We ran SYSmark 2004 SE and custom tests involving the following tasks alone and while scanning for viruses: photo editing, gaming, music encoding, and video encoding.
Performance comparison: Three Dell XPS 400-series systems with various Intel processors We ran SYSmark 2004 SE and custom tests involving the following tasks alone and while scanning for viruses: photo editing, gaming, music encoding, and video encoding.
Performance comparison: Two Velocity Micro systems with AMD and Intel processors We ran SYSmark 2004 SE and custom tests involving the following tasks alone and while scanning for viruses: photo editing, gaming, music encoding, and video encoding.
Performance comparison: Two desktop systems with AMD and Intel processors We compared the performance of two systems on BAPCo’s SYSmark 2004 SE and custom tests involving the following tasks alone and while scanning for viruses: photo editing, gaming, music encoding, and video encoding.
Measuring the effects of Intel vPro technology on the performance of routine business collaboration and productivity-related scenarios We ran typical enterprise multitasking scenarios t
hat involve real-time communication and collaboration with Microsoft Office Communicator 2005 and other common office applications.
Intel vPro technology: Measuring multitasking performance with common business applications and security programs We tested the performance in common business multitasking scenarios of Intel vPro Technology platforms with that of two other earlier platforms.
CPU performance: Two built-to-order systems We ran Futuremark's PCMark05 Professional on two Lenovo desktop systems available in the UK.
